On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 10:28:41AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > Could you just accept my patch as well as your patch? They do similar > things, but cater to different API, and I am happy with using the config > file. I don't see any point in providing two mechanisms for doing the same thing. The only thing I'd consider is adding configuration parameters that provide default values for the VENDOR_ELEM values. That said, I'm not sure I really buy that use case as something that would justify the extra complexity. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
