Hi guys, Roshan updated binder patches to the current working state. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/583795/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/583796/ Can you please take a look? Thanks, Dmitry On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 08:07 -0800, Paul Stewart wrote: >> >> I'll add the obligatory comment that for other projects we did end up >> writing a tool [1] for taking in an XML D-Bus interface definition >> (as taken from an introspection) and generating abstract object >> definitions for all of the D-Bus RPC objects in our >> applications. This meant that implementing the functionality just >> required writing a subclass of each of these generated objects. We >> ended up adding a couple small annotations to the XML, e.g., >> asynchronous vs. synchronous methods. > > Nice. > >> As Christopher says, Binder has it's own interface definition >> language and semantics. >> Writing a "master interface definition language" to generate those >> two other definition languages sounds a little too academic. :-) > > Yeah, it probably is. It seems it ought to be possible, but I've never > really played with either (binder or dbus) much... > Perhaps kdbus will eventually take over everything ;-) > johannes > > > _______________________________________________ > Hostap mailing list > Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
