On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 23:33 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > > One more challenge with the D-Bus interface has been that it is still > far from the capabilities of the ctrl_iface implementation. The > latter happens to be the one that I use as the first target for > everything new and in practice, it will be superset of all control > interface in what kind of functionality gets exposed. Having active > contributors to help maintain any new interface would obviously be > important to avoid issues with an interface not being sufficient for > something. This is kinda why I've always thought it'd be good to generate all the APIs from a single base specification. That would also help tremendously for consistency, and even implementation-wise it'd be far less "code". I don't really have a good feeling for how feasible this is yet, but it seems that the biggest issue would likely be around the existing ctrl_iface rather than any new additions. Christopher, are you or anyone else involved going to be at netdev next month, perhaps we could discuss this there? johannes _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
