On Feb 28, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Nick Lowe <nick.lowe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Not to put words in his mouth, I am sure Alan will say and agree that > hostapd should -never- be in the position that it does not send a > NAS-Identifier. Alan? It would be nice to send a NAS-Identifier. The NAS-IP-Address is often a "private" IP that doesn't make it across proxies. > It is mandatory from the perspective that RADIUS doesn't work reliably > where this is omitted, nor that it is mandatory in the RFC. A NAS MUST send either NAS-IP-Address, or NAS-IPv6-Address, or NAS-Identifier in an Accounting-Request packet. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap