Not to put words in his mouth, I am sure Alan will say and agree that hostapd should -never- be in the position that it does not send a NAS-Identifier. Alan? It is mandatory from the perspective that RADIUS doesn't work reliably where this is omitted, nor that it is mandatory in the RFC. I do think that it is hostapd that should enforce that multiple BSSes are not being accounted with, where Accounting-On/Accounting-Off are being sent, with the same or no NAS-Identifier. That is the problem that we need to solve. Pushing that bad elsewhere seems a mistake to me. We won't actually see the problem being resolved. I agree that it going to be problematic if the BSSID isn't consistent and we should use something else at that point. Thanks for the insight. Nick _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
