On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 02:09:44PM +0000, Peer, Ilan wrote: > > > Support configurations that use a dedicated P2P device interface by > > > setting ext_mgmt_frame_handling and waiting for MGMT-RX event on the > > > global control interface. > Would you prefer to handle this by adding an argument to the mgmt._rx to state if this is P2P frame or not and have the method resolve the interface name internally based on whether P2P Device is used or not (something similar to list_networks()). To be honest, I'm not sure I'd want either and I'm not sure I understand the need to make this specific test case "work" with the where mac80211_hwsim is forced to use a separate P2P Device interface. I would much rather focus on making sure there is sufficient coverage for both options in test cases without relying to running tests with custom configuration that results in this type of issues in the first place. In other words, I'd rather leave this as-is and if something is missing from testing coverage with P2P Device interface, that should addressed by adding a new test case that adds a dynamic hwsim radio with P2P Device interface and then appropriately targeted SET and wait-event commands on the interface that handles P2P messages. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
