Daniel, On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak.dk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I posted on this topic a little while back ( a month or 2 from memory ). The > icon theme you're using has to have icons of the same name that you're > trying to use. If you're using a 'default' ( eg adwaita ) icon theme in > conjunction with icon names that used to work a couple of years ago, you're > likely to have issues. Either choose an older icon theme, or migrate to the > new 'best practices'. Problem is I am not running under GNOME. I have KDE4 installed on my machine and I'm trying to port the GTK2 app to work with GTK3. The thing is - I want to have a clean compilation before saying: this works fine. ;-) Now, since you mention "best practice", let me ask you - what is it? Using named icon? If yes - can you throw in some code? I will see if that will find the icon... > > You can also run with GTK_DEBUG=icontheme set - this can show you some info > about where gtk is looking to find icons. See > https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/gtk-running.html Now, I may be able to install GNOME and run it there just to make sure KDE is out of the picture. ;-) > > Good luck, Gentoo warrior :) Oh ... you're running 'stable' ... luck not > required ;) Yup, I will need it. Thank you. > > Dan > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Igor Korot <ikorot01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Stefan et al, >> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Stefan Salewski <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 12:28 -0400, Igor Korot wrote: >> >> But then how do I set the label for such button? >> >> It looks like this function can be used for bitmap buttons only (no >> >> labels). >> > >> > Of course you can continue using the deprecated stock item, as long as >> > that still works... >> > >> > My impression is, that recommendation for recent GTK3 is to have only >> > textual label for buttons and menu items generally, with some >> > exceptions... >> > >> > We can use gtk_button_new() with a container widget argument, which may >> > contain a label and an image. Some details I found here >> > >> > https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkImageMenuItem.html >> > >> > Unfortunately that is some more work now... >> >> Here is what I have right now: >> >> [code] >> static >> GtkWidget *gtk_my_dialog_add_button_to (GtkBox *box, const gchar *label, >> const gchar *stock, gint >> response_id) >> { >> /* create the button */ >> GtkWidget *button = gtk_button_new_with_mnemonic (label); >> gtk_widget_set_can_default(button, true); >> GtkWidget *image = NULL; >> #if GTK_CHECK_VERSION( 3, 10, 0 ) >> if( !gtk_check_version( 3, 10, 0 ) ) >> { >> image = gtk_image_new_from_icon_name( stock, GTK_ICON_SIZE_BUTTON >> ); >> } >> else >> #endif >> { >> /* add a stock icon inside it */ >> wxGCC_WARNING_SUPPRESS(deprecated-declarations); >> image = gtk_image_new_from_stock (stock, GTK_ICON_SIZE_BUTTON); >> wxGCC_WARNING_RESTORE() >> } >> gtk_button_set_image (GTK_BUTTON (button), image); >> >> /* add to the given (container) widget */ >> if (box) >> gtk_box_pack_end (box, button, FALSE, TRUE, 8); >> >> /* add the button to the dialog's action area */ >> gtk_dialog_add_action_widget (GTK_DIALOG (dlg), button, response_id); >> >> return button; >> } >> >> extern "C" { >> static void gtk_my_dialog_init(GTypeInstance* instance, void*) >> { >> // some code >> #if GTK_CHECK_VERSION( 3, 10, 0 ) >> if( !gtk_check_version( 3, 10, 0 ) ) >> { >> continuebtn = gtk_assert_dialog_add_button( dlg, "Continue", >> "yes", GTK_ASSERT_DIALOG_CONTINUE); >> } >> else >> #endif >> { >> wxGCC_WARNING_SUPPRESS(deprecated-declarations); >> continuebtn = gtk_assert_dialog_add_button (dlg, "_Continue", >> GTK_STOCK_YES, GTK_ASSERT_DIALOG_CONTINUE); >> wxGCC_WARNING_RESTORE(); >> } >> // some more code >> } >> [/code] >> >> I am running currently KDE-4 on Gentoo Linux (stable). This peice of >> code works when running against GTK+-2.24, i.e. I see >> both label and the icon. However, when running against GTK+-3.16.5 all >> I can see is just a text and no icon. >> >> What am I doing wrong? Am I using the right replacements? Do I use it >> properly? >> >> Thank you. >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> gtk-list mailing list >> gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list > > _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
