----- Original Message ----- > From: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Olav Vitters <olav@xxxxxxxxxx>; "gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx" <gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:13 PM > Subject: Re: Hello, some of us still care about memory usage > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> I haven't written a Qt application in my life. I do have a gtk+-based > (through Perl bindings) application though. >> >> But to me it looks like gtk+ more and more lags behind Qt. I am still > waiting for a detailed answer proving otherwise. > > The grass is always greener on the other side. Ever since Nokia > dropped funding for Qt, both it and GTK+ are both community projects > at this point. > ?????????????????? I am asking about _features_ and _capabilities_. For example, today I wouldn't even consider gtk+ because Qt comes with Qt-script and QML which are enough "Perlish" (actually, it's close to JavaScript, which is enough "Perlish" - closures, anonymity, etc). I.e. had I started today, I would have written my application in Qt + Qt-script + QML. But let's get back to basics. 1) is gtk+ faster than Qt ? 2) does gtk+ consume less memory than Qt ? 3) do gtk+ widgets better preserve their visual quality with changing screen resolution ? Thanks, Sergei. _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
