>________________________________ > From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh@xxxxxxxxx> >Cc: John Lindgren <john.lindgren@xxxxxxx>; "gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx" <gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:59 AM >Subject: Re: Hello, some of us still care about memory usage > > > > > >On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>Is then switching to Qt a viable/practical alternative ? >> > > this list is not an appropriate forum to discuss the relative merits of both toolkits. > > > Why ? Aren't gtk+ developers the most appropriate persons to explain in what gtk+ is better ? ... The OP has a problem with gtk+ support on Windows; AFAIR Qt was meant to be cross-platform; from your reply it's clear there are not enough resources among gtk+ developers to support the Windows port, so, taking all this into consideration, I think my question is quite practical and in order. Regards, Sergei. _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
