On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:00 PM, David Nečas <yeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:49:32PM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: >> I don't think it's a good idea to try and transfer a 96x96 and >> 48x48 icon over the wire, either. > > Do you have any data comparing the transfer of 96×96 icon with the data > that programs already do transfer over the wire? So. In order to carry a 16x16, 22x22, 24x24, and a 32x32 icon, we have: >>> [x*x*4 for x in [16, 22, 24, 32]] [1024, 1936, 2304, 4096] and the sum is: >>> sum(_) 9360 So, around 1k. Not that bad. >>> [x*x*4 for x in [48, 96]] [9216, 36864] >>> sum(_) + 9360 55440 55k for an icon is stretching it. We already have a way to load a high-quality icon for an application. I don't think punting 96x96 icons across the wire is worthwhile. Application matching has a lot of other benefits, so it's worthwhile just to create a .desktop file. > Yeti > -- Jasper _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
