The issue is that GTK+ doesn't transfer a high-quality icon over the
wire. I don't think it's a good idea to try and transfer a 96x96 and
48x48 icon over the wire, either.
We do application matching, and use the icon name provided by the
desktop file in that case.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Mattias Gaertner
<nc-gaertnma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:15:40 +0330
> Bijan Binaee <bijanbina@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> i find that gnome automatically set icon for known application for example
>> eog!
>>
>> if you rename the eog binary file you see that the icon manually set with
>> gtk_window_set_default_icon_name and the result is the icon quality
>> decrease i notice again that
>> i use gtk_window_set_default_icon_name ("eog");
>> to test some other icon and the result is the eog icon quality decrease too!
>>
>> you can see it in
>> http://up98.org/upload/server1/02/a/y2v05wuq758mebtl1y8d.jpg
>>
>> in my theme i have all size so gtk have some fault!
>>
>> i also check some other big project like gnome-power-setting and i realize
>> that icon of that project set automatically too and if you rename the
>> binary file you could see the icon quality decrease
>>
>> now what sould i do?
>
> I have the same problem under Ubuntu and Linux Mint. Did you find a
> solution?
>
> Mattias
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-list mailing list
> gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
--
Jasper
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
