El jue, 14-01-2010 a las 08:36 +1100, Andrew Cowie escribió: > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 23:13 +0200, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > > El mié, 13-01-2010 a las 22:49 +0200, sledge hammer escribió: > > > You'd better try better luck by removing the widgets you don't need, > > than by isolating only one.. but still, all this seems a bit strange to > > me. > > Is there any reason we shouldn't just tell this person to just subclass > the existing GtkFixed GObject and thence implement whatever they want to > do in the subclass? You didn't get the point that he wants to test a bug fix in the widget itself, without the need to build the whole GTK+... Claudio PS: But it seems that's easier to just build it. _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
