On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 23:13 +0200, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > El mié, 13-01-2010 a las 22:49 +0200, sledge hammer escribió: > You'd better try better luck by removing the widgets you don't need, > than by isolating only one.. but still, all this seems a bit strange to > me. Is there any reason we shouldn't just tell this person to just subclass the existing GtkFixed GObject and thence implement whatever they want to do in the subclass? Admittedly subclassing GObjects is a lot of boilerplate work, but it's still easier than attempting to rip apart the library (which we all know is a blind alley anyway). AfC Sydney
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
