Nicely put! On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Michael Natterer <mitch@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 16:16 -0200, frederico schardong wrote: > >> The difference is that not a really object-oriented, is a fake object-oriented. >> >> I call it fake object-oriented environment, maybe not the most >> correctly name, but i think is true. >> >> What do you think? > > Object oriented is a programming paradigm, not a computer > language. Just because C lacks the syntactic sugar to do OO > in a more compact way says *nothing* about the possibility > to use it for OO programming. It is after all turing complete. > > There is nothing "fake" here. > > The fact that a gas oven has a much nicer user interface > doesn't make an old wood-fired stone oven a "fake" oven. > > ciao, > --mitch > > > _______________________________________________ > gtk-list mailing list > gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list > -- Gerald Britton _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
