On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 16:16 -0200, frederico schardong wrote: > The difference is that not a really object-oriented, is a fake object-oriented. > > I call it fake object-oriented environment, maybe not the most > correctly name, but i think is true. > > What do you think? Object oriented is a programming paradigm, not a computer language. Just because C lacks the syntactic sugar to do OO in a more compact way says *nothing* about the possibility to use it for OO programming. It is after all turing complete. There is nothing "fake" here. The fact that a gas oven has a much nicer user interface doesn't make an old wood-fired stone oven a "fake" oven. ciao, --mitch _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
