"Donny Viszneki" <donny.viszneki@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Maciej Piechotka <uzytkownik2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello. How to handle it in the most glib-style. I have a 2 classes - A >> and B. >> A: >> - Should have a virtual method returning B >> B: >> - Should have a virtual method returning A > > Your use of the term "classes" in a question about the "most > glib-style" way of doing something intrigues and confounds me. > > If you're using C++, a forward declaration of a class is very simple: > > class ClassName; > > This construct is obviously useful for correctly parsing code with > cyclical (not quite the same as recursive!) dependencies. > > On the other hand, C is what I think of when I think of "most glib > style." But that doesn't make sense either since there are no formal > classes in C, and therefore no formal language for virtual methods! > I mean of course GObject. Nothing formal does not exists but there are common conventions - about which I ask. Regards -- I've probably left my head... somewhere. Please wait untill I find it. Homepage (pl_PL): http://uzytkownik.jogger.pl/ (GNU/)Linux User: #425935 (see http://counter.li.org/) _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
