On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Maciej Piechotka <uzytkownik2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello. How to handle it in the most glib-style. I have a 2 classes - A > and B. > A: > - Should have a virtual method returning B > B: > - Should have a virtual method returning A Your use of the term "classes" in a question about the "most glib-style" way of doing something intrigues and confounds me. If you're using C++, a forward declaration of a class is very simple: class ClassName; This construct is obviously useful for correctly parsing code with cyclical (not quite the same as recursive!) dependencies. On the other hand, C is what I think of when I think of "most glib style." But that doesn't make sense either since there are no formal classes in C, and therefore no formal language for virtual methods! -- http://codebad.com/ _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
