On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 08:56 -0600, skip@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Peter> The handler added by g_idle_add() would have a different > Peter> execution priority than you might want. > > Peter> g_idle_add_full (G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, ...); > > Peter> Might be a closer equivalent to what the OP was wanting; some > Peter> means to get their callback called soon after the execution gets > Peter> back to the main-loop. > > Yes. Would g_timeout_add_full(G_PRIORITY_HIGH, ...) be even better or might > the main loop not regain control before the callback executes? Briefly scanning the source-code, I don't think so. The whole point of these routines is that the callbacks are always called from the mainloop. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
