On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 23:07 -0500, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:46 PM, <skip@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Is it valid to call g_timeout_add with an interval of 0? If so, does it > > have well-defined semantics? Might it recognize the 0ms interval and call > > the handler immediately or will it guarantee that we at least return to the > > main loop first? > > I think what you want to use is g_idle_add(). The handler added by g_idle_add() would have a different execution priority than you might want. g_idle_add_full (G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, ...); Might be a closer equivalent to what the OP was wanting; some means to get their callback called soon after the execution gets back to the main-loop. Regards, -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
