On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:03:46 -0700 (PDT) Bobby wrote: > > I'm not sure if we're proving that the original post > had a point or that we have a lot of hardware, some of > it good, some of it crap ;) It seems to me that you're proving that doing something mildly outrageous on the sort of machine you can find being thrown in the local dump (this Athlon 1.1 GHz machine I'm using was rescued from just such a fate) is nonetheless just about possible. Though the implication that 2.8 was much better than 2.10 is interesting! _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
