Just tried the test again on the following: * Athlon 1.1 GHz * gtk 2.10.8 * nVidia GeForce 2 MX 400 * Same defaults and I see about 99% CPU usage, shared by XOrg and the executable itself, in about a 2-1 ratio. I'm not sure if we're proving that the original post had a point or that we have a lot of hardware, some of it good, some of it crap ;) --- jcupitt@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 4/3/07, Bobby Jack <bobbykjack@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > My results with the following: > > > > * Intel P4 3.2 GHz > > * Onboard graphics controller (this may well be > the > > limitation) > > * GTK 2.10.8 > > * Test program defaults (50 labels, 100 FPS) > > > > are CPU usage consistently above 50%. I can try to > > reproduce this on another machine (much slower > CPU, > > better - although still quite old - nvidia > graphics > > card) if that would be useful. > > That's interesting. I just tried on my laptop (1.8 > GHz PM, ATI > mobility, gtk2.10) and I get about 40% CPU usage, > which is more than > I'd expect. I'll try building gtk2.10 on my work > machine tomorrow and > see if 2.8 -> 2.10 makes much difference. > > John > ____________________________________________________________________________________ It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list