On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:11:15 +0800 Xyber Blue <xyberblue@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Ok. Thanks for the info Mr. Suzuki... >BTW, the X Window that we are use is the tiny X server for embedded systems. > >We only noticed this now because we are not the one doing the X window port >for FRV, Im very sorry for this. We used the XFree86-4.3.0 package and it >has been built with "-DNO_LOCALE -DX_LOCALE" standard defines. I'm wondering why the packager produced libc-locale-disabled-X for Linux on glibc, because disabling libc-locale does not improve X server from the viewpoint of codesize, speed, resourcefile, etc etc. Could I contact with X porting team? I guess the configuration is for uClibc/newlibc whose locale is reduced and not full-featured. In fact, cross.def bundled to XFree86 and Xorg is a sample for Linux/ARM with X_LOCALE. I tried cross-building of XFree86-4.3.0 for FR-V by RedHat GNUpro toolkit. I had trouble in buildling OpenGL and fontconfig related libraries. _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
