> Yes, after discussion with Vaishnav and trying to brainstorm some way to do > the same thing with dt overlays, it seems that trying to use dt overlays > will mean need to have completely separate implementation of mikroBUS for > local ports and mikroBUS over greybus. Could you explain why please? Are greybus I2C bus masters different from physical I2C bus masters? Are greybus SPI bus masters different from physical SPI bus masters? > Additionally, trying to put dt overlays in EEPROM would mean they > will be incompatible with use in local ports and vice versa. I don't think you need to put the DT overlay in the EEPROM. All you need to do is translate the manifest into DT for those simple devices which can be described by the limited manifest format. For more complex devices, you use the ID to go find a DT fragment which describes the board, and skip the manifest to DT transformation. Andrew _______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list -- greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to greybus-dev-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|