On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:59:49PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > just some nitpicks: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 01:04:33AM +0200, Menna Mahmoud wrote: > > > > Convert `to_gbphy_dev` and `to_gbphy_driver` macros into a > > > > static inline function. > > > > > > > > it is not great to have macro that use `container_of` macro, > > > > > > s/it/It/; s/macro/macros/; s/use/use the/; > > > > > > > because from looking at the definition one cannot tell what type > > > > it applies to. > > > > [...] > > > > -#define to_gbphy_dev(d) container_of(d, struct gbphy_device, dev) > > > > +static inline struct gbphy_device *to_gbphy_dev(const struct device *d) > > > > > > drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c always passes a variable named > > > "dev" to this macro. So I'd call the parameter "dev", too, instead of > > > "d". This is also a more typical name for variables of that type. > > > > I argued against that. Because then there are two uses of dev > > in the argument of container_of, and they refer to completely different > > things. It's true that by the way container_of works, it's fine, but it > > may be misleading. > > Hmm, that seems to be subjective, but I have less problems with that > than with using "d" for a struct device (or a struct device_driver). > I'd even go so far as to consider it nice if they are identical. > > Maybe that's because having the first and third argument identical is > quite common: > > $ git grep -P 'container_of\((?<ident>[A-Za-z_0-9-]*)\s*,[^,]*,\s*\g{ident}\s*\)' | wc -l > 5940 > > which is >44% of all the usages > > $ git grep -P 'container_of\((?<ident>[A-Za-z_0-9-]*)\s*,[^,]*,\s*(?&ident)\s*\)' | wc -l > 13362 OK, if people like that, then why not. But it's dangerous if the call to container_of is in a macro, rather than in a function. julia
_______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list -- greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to greybus-dev-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx