Re: New Development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/11/16 08:53, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tuesday 29 Nov 2016 17:40:43 Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 29/11/16 15:36, Alex Elder wrote:
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> I agree with everything you said about SVC, control, TimeSync and to and
>> as it currently is - firmware too.
>>
>> I also agree we need a well defined long term target to shoot for.
>> Implied in the target of becoming a self-describing IoT bus is that its
>> no longer a UniPro centric bus.
>>
>> I think the main question/concern (mostly question) I have is - are we
>> going to try to maintain any type of UniPro support and if so
>>
>> - To what level
>> - On what hardware
>>
>> Also I wonder what take Motorola has (if any) on the whole zapping
>> UniPro thing. It would be nice to somehow support UniPro but, given we
>> have no hardware to test it out on - it's not clear how productive or
>> realistic that would really be - perhaps a complete waste of time.
>>
>> So my question/statement is, is UniPro officially dead in Greybus-V2 ?
> 
> I'm also concerned about dropping UniPro support as it would just cut the 
> branch that the Moto-Z is sitting on. We've rushed merging greybus upstream in 
> order to avoid the forked version making it to mainline first. Moving in a 
> direction that would prevent Motorola from ever using the mainline kernel 
> wouldn't be nice.
> 

+ Jim

Any comment on the above Jim from Motorola's perspective ?

---
bod
_______________________________________________
greybus-dev mailing list
greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/greybus-dev




[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk App Development]     [PJ SIP]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [IETF Sipping]     [Info Cyrus]     [ALSA User]     [Fedora Linux Users]     [Linux SCTP]     [DCCP]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Asterisk Books]

  Powered by Linux