Re: New Development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29/11/16 15:36, Alex Elder wrote:
> What do you think?

I agree with everything you said about SVC, control, TimeSync and to and
as it currently is - firmware too.

I also agree we need a well defined long term target to shoot for.
Implied in the target of becoming a self-describing IoT bus is that its
no longer a UniPro centric bus.

I think the main question/concern (mostly question) I have is - are we
going to try to maintain any type of UniPro support and if so

- To what level
- On what hardware

Also I wonder what take Motorola has (if any) on the whole zapping
UniPro thing. It would be nice to somehow support UniPro but, given we
have no hardware to test it out on - it's not clear how productive or
realistic that would really be - perhaps a complete waste of time.

So my question/statement is, is UniPro officially dead in Greybus-V2 ?

---
bod
_______________________________________________
greybus-dev mailing list
greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/greybus-dev




[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk App Development]     [PJ SIP]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [IETF Sipping]     [Info Cyrus]     [ALSA User]     [Fedora Linux Users]     [Linux SCTP]     [DCCP]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Asterisk Books]

  Powered by Linux