Hello Mike! Mike Frysinger [Sat, May 31, 2008 at 12:23:20AM -0400]: > is there a reason the usage of socklen_t in gpm is inconsistent ? "it's all about history..." > if the code > base you're building against doesnt supply socklen_t, it's a great big pile > imo (this is after all required by POSIX). if we want to support such crappy > systems, we should move the socklen_t check into configure and have the > source assume it's available. I think that's a good solution (autoconf/assume it is there/exit error if not). Nico -- Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/ PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42 F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ gpm mailing list gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/gpm