socklen_t handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



is there a reason the usage of socklen_t in gpm is inconsistent ?  if the code 
base you're building against doesnt supply socklen_t, it's a great big pile 
imo (this is after all required by POSIX).  if we want to support such crappy 
systems, we should move the socklen_t check into configure and have the 
source assume it's available.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
gpm mailing list
gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/gpm

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]