Good morning, Rod Berriman [Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:24:10AM +1100]: > first of all, GPM is a great piece of software. Nico to hear! > [wheel] > - why are there 3 patches in gpm/patches/todo/imwheel ? Because all were submitted to be included > - is one of them preferred? I did not have a look at them for a long time - possibly all three have senseful code; have a look at them and try to use the cleanest version > - does the git repository have all the history of the project? > I'm not a git expert, but it seems to me that the history of the > project has been collapsed. No. Git was introduced after 1.19.x. > - does anyone have the earlier CVS or SVN repository, to be able to view > 1.19.3 ? Maybe Alessandro..iirc there are at least the tarballs available at the ftp-site. > - should all future work go to GPM2, or is GPM to be continued in parallel? gpm and gpm2 will be developed in parallel. sometimes borrowing code from each other (cleanup from gpm2 goes to gpm1 and patches available for gpm1 will also go into gpm2). Thus said I just merged the gpm2 branch into 1.20.1-bugfix branch, which contains the splittoff of many of the old huge files, and runs on my notebook for some time. This breaks many of the old patches, but was needed for years to have a better view about all the code. Sincerly, Nico -- Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/ PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42 F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ gpm mailing list gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/gpm