Port forwarding sometimes is the only option... GnuGk supports this, but it is the cause for the most questions here on the list about one-way media issues etc. Thats why I have a hard time reccomending it, especially to new users. Also, beware that the ports used by H.323 are dynamically negotiated. Regards, Jan -- Jan Willamowius, Founder of the GNU Gatekeeper Project EMail : jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Website: http://www.gnugk.org Support: http://www.willamowius.com/gnugk-support.html Relaxed Communications GmbH Frahmredder 91 22393 Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Jan Willamowius HRB 125261 (Amtsgericht Hamburg) USt-IdNr: DE286003584 Michael Ivanov wrote: > Thanks for the response Jan! > > Do you mean to give a PC with GnuGK an external IP address? I'm afraid > this is not really an option for us, since we have a single internet > connection which goes through series 800 cisco router. Everything behind > the router is on non-routable segments (192,168.*.*). So I guess then I > will have to provide static NAT mapping for gatekeeper related ports ... :-( > > Best regards, > > 14.10.2015 23:02, Jan Willamowius пишет: > > Hi Mikhail, > > > > I haven't used H.323 support in a Cisco 800, but the general advice is > > not to rely on H.323 helpers in NAT routers, but to place a GnuGk in > > front of the NAT router and to use the H.323's NAT traversal protocols > > (H.460.18/.19) instead. > > > > Regards, > > Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
