Hi, I've always thought that the situation with the licensing is rather clear. Any derivative work must apply for licenses of its own or deactivate the H.460.18/19/23/24 related code. A derivative work meaning any kind of codebase with private modifications that aren't in the project's official public repo. This is at least how I've interpreted it. So when I've e.g. added new auth or acct modules of my own I've always flagged the patented features out of the compilation completely or just made sure that they aren't being used in any way during runtime. I try to play it as safe as possible in order to avoid unnecessary trouble later on. Have I misunderstood this licensing issue? Regards, Esa Nyrhinen 08/26/2013 10:34 PM, Jan Willamowius kirjoitti: > Hi, > > the GNU Gatekeeper project has license agreements for the use of the > patents covering H.460.18 and .19 and H.460.23 and .24. > > These agreements certainly cover the official GnuGk versions. The > situation is a bit unclear how far other people versions are covered, > too. > > Regards, > Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. Visit us today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
