Re: Question about disengageRequest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ian!

 

I have done that and on the SIP side the negotiation is looking good:

From Mirial:

Sip Invite (with  SDP) to SIP side looks OK

Sip Trying, Sip Ringing OK

                             Sip OK (with SDP) from SIP looks ok, with audio and media

                             Sip Ack to SIP should confirm the call setup.

 

Since it is the gnugk that is disconnecting the call (sending a disengageRequest to Mirial) it is hard to send this as a error report to Mirial. L

I can see the drop reason and google’d on it:

 

DisengageReason ::= CHOICE

{

         forcedDrop                         NULL,    -- gatekeeper is forcing the drop

         normalDrop                         NULL,    -- associated with normal drop

         undefinedReason                    NULL,

         ...

}

 

Not sure if it is possible to squeeze any more information from the gnugk (-tttttttt right now) but even thou I get lots of:

 

2011/11/29 16:29:04.714 6           yasocket.cxx(845)   ProxyH(4) waiting...

2011/11/29 16:29:05.711 6           yasocket.cxx(845)   ProxyH(1) waiting...

2011/11/29 16:29:05.711 6           yasocket.cxx(845)   ProxyH(0) waiting...

2011/11/29 16:29:05.712 6           yasocket.cxx(845)   ProxyH(3) waiting...

2011/11/29 16:29:05.712 6           yasocket.cxx(845)   ProxyH(2) waiting...

2011/11/29 16:29:05.714 6           yasocket.cxx(845)   ProxyRTP(0) waiting...

2011/11/29 16:29:05.714 6           yasocket.cxx(845)   GkStatus waiting...

 

I get nothing more about that disengageRequest with forcedDrop made by gatekeeper. L

I appreciate a comments and suggestions. J

 

Best Regards,

Mikael

 

Från: Ian Blenke [mailto:ian@xxxxxxxxxx]
Skickat: den 29 november 2011 22:17
Till: GNU Gatekeeper Users
Ämne: Re: Question about disengageRequest

 

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mikael Grehn <mikael.grehn@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Ian and thank you!

 

Could be a compatibility issue BUT calls from one primary gatekeeper through Mirial and to SIP side is working perfectly.

 

It is when I add a second (neighborhood) gatekeeper on a separate IP for an second customer but need to use only one Mirial H3232SIP gateway that this second customer runs into problems with disconnected calls after approx. 20 seconds.

 

So I feel that there is something else with this 2 gnugk setup and neighborhood-thing that is causing this!

 

Am I correct and what can cause problems with 2 gnugk’s that I want Mirial to register to?

Thanks for your help!

 

If you do not have vendor support with Mirial, your next step is really to fire up wireshark and take a look at the signaling to see what isn't being fully negotiated correctly that is causing the 20 second timeout.

 

Without a packet capture to look at (which really isn't a good idea to post on a mailing list), it's really mostly guessing.

 

--
- Ian Blenke <ian@xxxxxxxxxx> http://ian.blenke.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux