Re: Routing help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Guys,
    Got side tracked for a few days but I need to get back to this problem.
I have set the CompareAliasType=0 and I still can't call between two gnugk's.

Here is my gatekeeper.ini

[Gatekeeper::Main]
Fourtytwo=42
Name=MagorH323GK
TimeToLive=100
CompareAliasType=0
# Home=your.public.ip.addr
# TotalBandwidth=128000
#
# each G.723.1 call consume 1280 Bps.


[RoutedMode]
GKRouted=1
H245Routed=1
AcceptUnregisteredCalls=1
AcceptNeighborsCalls=1
CallSignalPort=1720
CallSignalHandlerNumber=1
RemoveH245AddressOnTunneling=1
DropCallsByReleaseComplete=1
SupportNATedEndpoints=1
SupportCallingNATedEndpoints=1
Q931PortRange=20000-20099
H245PortRange=30000-30099
SendReleaseCompleteOnDRQ=1

#[Routing::Explicit]
#10.191.20.0=192.168.216.1

[Proxy]
Enable=1
#InternalNetwork=192.168.216.0/24,10.191.20.0/24
InternalNetwork=192.168.216.0/24,10.191.20.0/24
T120PortRange=50000-59999
RTPPortRange=50000-59999
ProxyForNAT=1
ProxyForSameNAT=0
ProxyAlways=1

# [ModeSelection]


[RasSrv::LRQFeatures]
NeighborTimeout=6
ForwardHopCount=8
AlwaysForwardLRQ=1
IncludeDestinationInfoInLCF=1
CiscoGKCompatible=1

[RasSrv::Neighbors]
#
# List of some possible neighbors can be downloaded
# from http://www.cic.ac.id/gkregistration

[RoutingPolicy]
default=explicit,internal,srv,dns,internal,parent,neighbor

[GkStatus::Auth]
rule=allow
# your.public.ip.addr=allow
;default=forbid

On 2011-10-04, at 3:35 PM, Jan Willamowius wrote:

> Hi Fred,
> 
> this is your problem: Your destination isn't sent as an E.164.
> 
>>        destinationAddress = 1 entries {
>>          [0]=h323_ID  4 characters {
>>            0035 0035 0038 0030                       5580
>>          }
>>        }
> 
> You are trying to call H323ID "5580", but your endpoint is E164 "5580".
> According to the spec those are 2 different things, even so Tandberg usually
> treats them as the same.
> 
> If you want aliases to match regardless of their type, you can set in
> your config
> 
> [Gatekeeper::Main]
> CompareAliasType=0
> 
> Its still strange that the DNS policy thinks it can resolve it. I'll
> check into that when I rewrite the policy for IPv6 soon.
> 
> Regards,
> Jan
> 
> 
> Fred Gillette wrote:
>> Yup,
>> 
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.406	4	    yasocket.cxx(920)	TCPSrv	Accept request on 74.199.95.14:1720
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.406	5	         job.cxx(363)	JOB	Worker threads: 6 total - 6 busy, 0 idle
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.406	5	         job.cxx(189)	JOB	Starting Job Acceptor at Worker thread 139753991223040
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.406	5	ProxyChannel.cxx(684)	Q931s	Reading from 216.13.45.141:20024
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.406	3	ProxyChannel.cxx(1023)	Q931s	Received: Setup CRV=22394 from 216.13.45.141:20024
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.407	4	ProxyChannel.cxx(966)	Q931	Received: {
>>  q931pdu = {
>>    protocolDiscriminator = 8
>>    callReference = 22394
>>    from = originator
>>    messageType = Setup
>>    IE: Bearer-Capability = {
>>      88 18 a0 a5                                        ....
>>    }
>>    IE: Display = {
>>      66 72 65 64 6c 61 70 74  6f 70 00                  fredlaptop.
>>    }
>>    IE: Calling-Party-Number = {
>>      81 36 38 37 37                                     .6877
>>    }
>>    IE: Called-Party-Number = {
>>      81 35 35 38 30                                     .5580
>>    }
>>    IE: User-User = {
>>      20 b0 06 00 08 91 4a 00  06 01 01 80 9b aa 22 c0    .....J.......".
>>      09 00 00 3d 0e 54 65 73  74 20 6d 6f 64 5f 68 33   ...=.Test mod_h3
>>      32 33 00 00 1d 31 2e 30  61 6c 70 68 61 31 20 28   23...1.0alpha1 (
>>      48 33 32 33 70 6c 75 73  20 76 31 2e 32 31 2e 30   H323plus v1.21.0
>>      29 00 00 00 01 40 03 00  35 00 35 00 38 00 30 00   )....@..5.5.8.0.
>>      ae 4c 6c c2 0b ed e0 11  9f 45 00 90 f5 99 89 f3   .Ll......E......
>>      00 5d 0f 80 07 00 d8 0d  2d 8d 06 b8 11 00 a4 4c   .]......-......L
>>      6c c2 0b ed e0 11 9f 45  00 90 f5 99 89 f3 01 00   l......E........
>>      01 00 13 10 00 31 00 30  00 34 00 39 00 5f 00 65   .....1.0.4.9._.e
>>      00 6e 00 64 00 70 01 00  01 00 02 80 01 80         .n.d.p........
>>    }
>>  }
>>  h225pdu = {
>>    h323_uu_pdu = {
>>      h323_message_body = setup {
>>        protocolIdentifier = 0.0.8.2250.0.6
>>        sourceAddress = 1 entries {
>>          [0]=dialedDigits "6877"
>>        }
>>        sourceInfo = {
>>          vendor = {
>>            vendor = {
>>              t35CountryCode = 9
>>              t35Extension = 0
>>              manufacturerCode = 61
>>            }
>>            productId =  15 octets {
>>              54 65 73 74 20 6d 6f 64  5f 68 33 32 33 00 00      Test mod_h323..
>>            }
>>            versionId =  30 octets {
>>              31 2e 30 61 6c 70 68 61  31 20 28 48 33 32 33 70   1.0alpha1 (H323p
>>              6c 75 73 20 76 31 2e 32  31 2e 30 29 00 00         lus v1.21.0)..
>>            }
>>          }
>>          terminal = {
>>          }
>>          mc = false
>>          undefinedNode = false
>>        }
>>        destinationAddress = 1 entries {
>>          [0]=h323_ID  4 characters {
>>            0035 0035 0038 0030                       5580
>>          }
>>        }
>>        activeMC = false
>>        conferenceID =  16 octets {
>>          ae 4c 6c c2 0b ed e0 11  9f 45 00 90 f5 99 89 f3   .Ll......E......
>>        }
>>        conferenceGoal = create <<null>>
>>        callType = pointToPoint <<null>>
>>        sourceCallSignalAddress = ipAddress {
>>          ip =  4 octets {
>>            d8 0d 2d 8d                                        ..-.
>>          }
>>          port = 1720
>>        }
>>        callIdentifier = {
>>          guid =  16 octets {
>>            a4 4c 6c c2 0b ed e0 11  9f 45 00 90 f5 99 89 f3   .Ll......E......
>>          }
>>        }
>>        mediaWaitForConnect = false
>>        canOverlapSend = false
>>        endpointIdentifier =  9 characters {
>>          0031 0030 0034 0039 005f 0065 006e 0064   1049_end
>>          0070                                      p
>>        }
>>        multipleCalls = false
>>        maintainConnection = false
>>      }
>>      h245Tunneling = true
>>    }
>>  }
>> }
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.407	4	ProxyChannel.cxx(2017)	Q931s	GWRewrite source for 216.13.45.141:20024: setup H323 ID or E164
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.407	5	     Routing.cxx(196)	ROUTING	Checking policy Explicit for request Setup CRV=22394
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.407	5	     Routing.cxx(196)	ROUTING	Checking policy Internal for request Setup CRV=22394
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.407	5	     Routing.cxx(196)	ROUTING	Checking policy SRV for request Setup CRV=22394
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.407	5	     Routing.cxx(196)	ROUTING	Checking policy DNS for request Setup CRV=22394
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.408	4	     Routing.cxx(604)	ROUTING	DNS policy resolves to 5580 @ 0.0.21.204:1720
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.408	5	     Routing.cxx(202)	ROUTING	Policy DNS applied to the request Setup CRV=22394
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.408	4	ProxyChannel.cxx(2411)	Q931s	Unregistered party is not NATed
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.408	2	      RasTbl.cxx(3412)	CallTable::Insert(CALL) Call No. 9, total sessions : 1
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.408	2	      gkacct.cxx(950)	GKACCT	Successfully logged event 1 for call no. 9
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.408	4	ProxyChannel.cxx(4794)	Q931s	Set Called Numbering Plan 1 Type Of Number 0
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.408	4	ProxyChannel.cxx(4824)	Q931s	Set Calling Numbering Plan 1 Type Of Number 0
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.408	3	ProxyChannel.cxx(2862)	Q931s	Call 9 is NAT type 0
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.408	1	ProxyChannel.cxx(870)	Call 9: h245Routed=1 proxy=1
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.408	3	ProxyChannel.cxx(887)	GK	Call 9 proxy enabled
>> 2011/10/04 11:32:38.409	4	ProxyChannel.cxx(966)	Q931	Send to 0.0.21.204:1720 {
>> 
>> On 2011-10-04, at 11:21 AM, Jan Willamowius wrote:
>> 
>>> Can you post the Setup or ARQ that is triggering the routing process ?
>>> Then we can see which fields GnuGk tries to route on.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Jan
>>> 
>>> Fred Gillette wrote:
>>>> The plot thickens...
>>>> 
>>>> The packets are arriving at the remote gnugk but it is rejecting the incoming call. It seems that it is resolving the call to a mysterious IP address.
>>>> 
>>>> 2011/10/04 10:49:55.159 4       ProxyChannel.cxx(2017)  Q931s   GWRewrite source for 216.13.45.141:20023: setup H323 ID or E164
>>>> 2011/10/04 10:49:55.160 5            Routing.cxx(196)   ROUTING Checking policy Explicit for request Setup CRV=22393
>>>> 2011/10/04 10:49:55.160 5            Routing.cxx(196)   ROUTING Checking policy Internal for request Setup CRV=22393
>>>> 2011/10/04 10:49:55.160 5            Routing.cxx(196)   ROUTING Checking policy SRV for request Setup CRV=22393
>>>> 2011/10/04 10:49:55.160 5            Routing.cxx(196)   ROUTING Checking policy DNS for request Setup CRV=22393
>>>> 2011/10/04 10:49:55.160 4            Routing.cxx(604)   ROUTING DNS policy resolves to 5580 @ 0.0.21.204:1720
>>>> 2011/10/04 10:49:55.160 5            Routing.cxx(202)   ROUTING Policy DNS applied to the request Setup CRV=22393
>>>> 
>>>> Here is the registration data from the console.
>>>> 
>>>> AllRegistrations
>>>> RCF|192.168.1.197:1720|5580:dialedDigits|terminal|6738_endp
>>>> Number of Endpoints: 1
>>>> 
>>>> Why would the gnugk resolve 5580 to 5580@0.0.21.204 ???
>>>> 
>>>> ..FG..
>>>> 
>>>> On 2011-10-04, at 8:36 AM, Jan Willamowius wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> You are looking at the status port which only shows a small number of
>>>>> events. I meant you should create a GnuGk trace:
>>>>> gnugk -c <your config> -ttttt -o trace.log
>>>>> 
>>>>> After the call, trace.log will contain a lot more useful hints what
>>>>> GnuGk received and what it did with it.
>>>>> You can also enable such a trace from the status port with "setlog
>>>>> trace.log" and "debug trc 5", but the command line variant is usually
>>>>> easier.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Jan
>>>>> 
>>>>> Fred Gillette wrote:
>>>>>> I seem to be only able to set a trace level of 2. See below...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> root@HDPassport1:~# telnet 192.168.217.79 7000
>>>>>> Trying 192.168.217.79...
>>>>>> Connected to 192.168.217.79.
>>>>>> Escape character is '^]'.
>>>>>> Version:
>>>>>> Gatekeeper(GNU) Version(2.3.4) Ext(pthreads=1,radius=1,mysql=1,pgsql=0,firebird=0,odbc=1,sqlite=1,large_fdset=0,crypto/ssl=1,h46018=0,h46023=1) H323Plus(1.21.0) PTLib(2.6.7) Build(Jul 14 2011, 15:16:35) Sys(Linux x86_64 2.6.32-26-generic)
>>>>>> Startup: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 08:23:32 -0400   Running: 0 days 23:36:58
>>>>>> ;
>>>>>> trace 5
>>>>>> Syntax Error: trace 0|1|2|"min"|"max"
>>>>>> trace max
>>>>>> Output trace level is 2
>>>>>> ACF|192.168.217.53:1720|1049_endp|22388|h323:5580@74.199.95.14:url_ID|6877:dialedDigits|false|ce-ea-1b-4a-ee-ec-e0-11-9f-44-00-90-f5-99-89-f3;
>>>>>> DCF|192.168.217.53|1049_endp|22388|normalDrop|ce-ea-1b-4a-ee-ec-e0-11-9f-44-00-90-f5-99-89-f3;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm trying to call 5580@74.199.95.14.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ..FG..
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2011-10-03, at 7:36 PM, Jan Willamowius wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You should do a level 5 trace for that call to see which policy GnuGk
>>>>>>> chooses to route the call and which IP it tries to forward the Setup to.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ajgillette98 wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I added the suggested entries in my gatekeeper.ini, but there seems to me no
>>>>>>>> difference.
>>>>>>>> If I try to call an H.323 endpoint external to my gnugk with an ip address
>>>>>>>> everything works. 
>>>>>>>> If I try to call with an extension and an IP the gnugk does not relay the
>>>>>>>> setup message. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I did a wireshark trace and saw the admission request, followed by the
>>>>>>>> admission confirm.
>>>>>>>> Then the setup followed by a release complete. When I dig into the release
>>>>>>>> complete I get
>>>>>>>> a cause value of "No route to destination (3)".
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If I try calling by IP without the extension the messages go out the public
>>>>>>>> NIC of the gnugk
>>>>>>>> but the far end does not know which endpoint I want to call.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ..FG..
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Willamowius wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> if you want GnuGk to resolve DNS names eg. in URLs, you should include
>>>>>>>>> the dns and srv policy in your config. I usually suggest this:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [RoutingPolicy]
>>>>>>>>> default=explicit,internal,srv,dns,internal,parent,neighbor 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ajgillette98 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hey Guys,
>>>>>>>>>> I have gnugk working great for calls to devices on the Internet but
>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>> I call gnugk to gnugk I get "calledPartyNotRegistered". I suspect that I
>>>>>>>>>> don't understand some aspect of routing? This seems to only happen when I
>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>> trying to call a URL xxxx@x.x.x.x if I call an ip address everything is
>>>>>>>>>> fine. 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> My gatekeeper.ini file has the following:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> [RoutedMode]
>>>>>>>>>> GKRouted=1
>>>>>>>>>> H245Routed=1
>>>>>>>>>> AcceptUnregisteredCalls=1
>>>>>>>>>> AcceptNeighborsCalls=1
>>>>>>>>>> CallSignalPort=1720
>>>>>>>>>> CallSignalHandlerNumber=1
>>>>>>>>>> RemoveH245AddressOnTunneling=1
>>>>>>>>>> DropCallsByReleaseComplete=1
>>>>>>>>>> SupportNATedEndpoints=1
>>>>>>>>>> SupportCallingNATedEndpoints=1
>>>>>>>>>> Q931PortRange=20000-20099
>>>>>>>>>> H245PortRange=30000-30099
>>>>>>>>>> SendReleaseCompleteOnDRQ=1
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> [Proxy]
>>>>>>>>>> Enable=1
>>>>>>>>>> InternalNetwork=192.168.216.0/24,10.191.20.0/24
>>>>>>>>>> T120PortRange=50000-59999
>>>>>>>>>> RTPPortRange=50000-59999
>>>>>>>>>> ProxyForNAT=1
>>>>>>>>>> ProxyForSameNAT=0
>>>>>>>>>> ProxyAlways=1
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> [RoutingPolicy]
>>>>>>>>>> default=explicit,internal
> 
> -- 
> Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________________
> 
> Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
> Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/


[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux