Petr Holub wrote: > > thats ok: VCS sends this LRQ to check if the other gatekeeper is alive > > and will accepty any response to it as a sign that the other gatekeeper > > is ok. So the LRJ is perfectly fine as a response. > > yeah, but it still should reply with LCF if the gatekeeper-monitoring-check > is created as a permanent endpoint, shouldn't it? It should, if it comes from a known neighbor. Unlike many other gatekeepers, GnuGk verifies the IP of the neighbor gatekeeper. If the reply comes from another IP, it gets rejected, unless you set AcceptNonNeighborLRQ=1. Regards, Jan -- Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
