Hi Jan,
> thats ok: VCS sends this LRQ to check if the other gatekeeper is alive
> and will accepty any response to it as a sign that the other gatekeeper
> is ok. So the LRJ is perfectly fine as a response.
yeah, but it still should reply with LCF if the gatekeeper-monitoring-check
is created as a permanent endpoint, shouldn't it?
With best regards,
Petr
================================================================
Petr Holub
CESNET z.s.p.o. CERIT-SC
Zikova 4 Institute of Compt. Science
162 00 Praha 6, CZ Masaryk University
Czech Republic Botanicka 68a, 60200 Brno, CZ
e-mail: Petr.Holub@xxxxxxxxx phone: +420-549493944
fax: +420-541212747
e-mail: hopet@xxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model
configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and
the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free
download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
