Re: GNU Gatekeeper Survey 2010

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Denis Kochmashev "Enforta" wrote:
> but as I see, there are no new "feature ideas" compared to last year survey.
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.

I really should have uploaded the updated list before posting. ;-)
Uploaded it now. Sorry.


> Please accept a small [RoutedMode] documentation correction. It is written
> there that by default TCPKeepAlive is set to 1. But according to source code
> it defaults to 0. That's because if (GkConfig()->HasKey(RoutedSec,
> "TcpKeepAlive")) condition is always checked first before calling
> SetOption(SO_KEEPALIVE, ...). So if a "TcpKeepAlive" key doesn't exist in
> [RoutedMode] (what is "default" from my point of view) SetOption is never
> being called.
>
> In my opinion it would even be better not to check if
> (GkConfig()->HasKey(RoutedSec, "TcpKeepAlive")). That would make
> TcpKeepAlive being switched on by default. That is what documentation was
> telling us for years :)

Thanks, for pointing that out. I have fixed the documentation instead
of changing the behaviour of all configurations no mentioning
TcpKeepAlive.

Regards,
Jan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Willamowius [mailto:jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:09 PM
> To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  GNU Gatekeeper Survey 2010
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to thank everybody who took part in the survey, it was
> very enlightening to hear all your opinions!
> 
> I have posted the results here:
> http://www.gnugk.org/survey-2010-results.html
> 
> The recent changes in the database drivers are a first reaction to the
> high number of people using the executables from gnugk.org and the
> extremely low number of people using GnuGk through their Linux
> distribution. The loadable drivers should give both of these groups a
> better choice which database to use and make life easier for the
> maintainers of the executables.
> 
> Another interesting result was, that this is the first year where a
> majority of GnuGk users used video conferencing. Until now, voice calls
> were most popular. It seems video is coming on strong.
> 
> I was surprised how little need users see for IPv6 support. I would
> have expected many more requests that we get it implemented and stable
> before IPv4 addresses run out.
> 
> A number of requests were added to the list of feature ideas that we
> might want to tackle in the future.
> http://www.gnugk.org/new-features.html
> 
> I always find this list very inspiring. ;-)
> 
> Thanks everyone,
> Jan

-- 
Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/


[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux