Andrew, if you don't want to follow the everchanging CVS repositories, the reccommendation on gnugk.org still stands: H323Plus CVS as of 2010-05-25 and PTLIB 2.8.1 That beeing said, for me all 3 CVS repositories compile fine as of today. Maybe you can post your compile issues to the respective mailing lists. Regards, Jan Andrew Herdman wrote: > From http://www.gnugk.org/compiling-gnugk.html > > H323Plus CVS as of 2010-05-25 and PTLIB 2.8.1 > > I was doing daily builds (scripted) using CVS from H323Plus, GNUGK and > SVN from PTLIB with success up to last week where H323plus stopped building. > > In futzing around with a date to actually pull PTLIB and H323PLUS from, > I have picked 2010-08-01 for both, as it builds and the current GNUGK > CVS is also happy to build with it. > > I am wondering however, if there is an official recommended date/version > to use with the current GNUGK code. I'm a little nervous running 3 > pieces from daily changing code, it's probably a recipe for broken things. > > Thanks > Andrew -- Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
