The idea of the parent gatekeeper is that it handles everything that you can't handle locally. So when a call reaches the 'parent' policy, because the other policies couldn't handle, it will always try to send it to the parent gatekeeper (with an ARQ). Since an endpoint can only be registered to one gatekeeper max, there isn't any selection mechanism between parent gatekeepers. However, if you really have to limit the parent gatekeeper to a certain prefix, you can install a different policy chain for that prefix. For example if only prefix 002 should go to the parent and you have a local catchall for all other calls, you could do this: [RoutingPolicy] 002=explicit,internal,parent default=explicit,internal,neighbor,catchall But I would strongly suggest not to define too many different routing chains. Its gets confusing pretty quickly. Regards, Jan Andrew Struiksma wrote: > >From my experience, no. You can use the E164 parameter to specify a comma separated list of all your extensions but they need to be the complete extensions but not just a prefix. However, I'd love to be proven wrong since that would be a nice alternate way to "neighbor." I used to use the [Endpoint] section to specify a gateway however that didn't seem to allow me to do everything I wanted to do including specify my own extensions within our state dialing plan. I'm still struggling with a few issues but so far prefer this method (#2). > > Andrew > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Liu [mailto:gfrankliu@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:49 PM > To: GNU Gatekeeper Users > Subject: Re: send prefix > > Yes, I understand it can be done with "method 2" like you detailed > below, but I was looking for a way to do it with "method 1" through > [Endpoint] registration. See my original email for details. > > Thanks! > Frank > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Andrew Struiksma <astruiksma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, you do something like this: > > > > [RasSrv::Neighbors] > > GK1=GnuGK > > > > [Neighbor::GK1] > > GatekeeperIdentifier=StateGK > > Host=xx.xx.xx.xx > > SendPrefixes=031,032,033,0011479 > > AcceptPrefixes=* > > > > Andrew > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Frank Liu [mailto:gfrankliu@xxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:27 PM > > To: GNU Gatekeeper Users > > Subject: send prefix > > > > Hi all, > > > > I understand we can "link" the gnu gatekeeper to another gatekeeper with > > > > [Endpoint] > > Gatekeeper=x.x.x.x > > Type=Gateway > > .... > > > > or > > [RasSrv::Neighbors] > > ... > > > > I prefer the first method, at least during testing phase, because gnu > > gk will "register" the prefix with the other gatekeeper, so the other > > gk knows what calls to send to me. > > For the second method, the other gatekeeper admin will need to > > configure his gk to specify which prefix to send to gnugk. > > > > The question I have is whether it is possible to specify a sendprefix > > in method one like in method two, so that only certain call matching > > the sendprefix will be sent to the other gk. > > > > Thanks! > > Frank -- Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
