Re: Call rejected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No, thats not a bug in the code: The alias got reduced to 800100010 as
you can see in the forwarded Setup.

Regards,
Jan

Frank Liu wrote:
> Looking at the below few lines from the log:
> 
> ....
> 2009/10/29 00:12:31.459 4       ProxyChannel.cxx(1868)  Q931s
> GWRewrite source for 10.161.15.6:11062: setup H323 ID or E164
> 2009/10/29 00:12:31.459 2            Toolkit.cxx(675)
> RewriteToE164: 800100010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx to 800100010
> 2009/10/29 00:12:31.459 2          singleton.cxx(25)    Create
> instance: PreliminaryCallTable(9)
> 2009/10/29 00:12:31.459 5            Routing.cxx(197)   ROUTING
> Checking policy Explicit for request Setup CRV=29760
> 2009/10/29 00:12:31.459 5            Routing.cxx(197)   ROUTING
> Checking policy Internal for request Setup CRV=29760
> 2009/10/29 00:12:31.459 5            Routing.cxx(197)   ROUTING
> Checking policy SRV for request Setup CRV=29760
> 2009/10/29 00:12:31.459 5            Routing.cxx(197)   ROUTING
> Checking policy DNS for request Setup CRV=29760
> 2009/10/29 00:12:31.459 4            Routing.cxx(616)   ROUTING DNS
> policy resolves to 800100010 @ 10.161.240.234:1720
> 2009/10/29 00:12:31.459 5            Routing.cxx(203)   ROUTING Policy
> DNS applied to the request Setup CRV=29760
> ...
> 
> Since the RewriteToE164 already rewrites the 800100010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> to 800100010, why does the ROUTING DNS policy still resolves to
> 800100010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx? Shouldn't the @ip part already be stripped?
> Is that a bug in the code?
> 
> Thanks!
> Frank
> 
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Frank Liu <gfrankliu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Has anybody tried the sample uri.ini file and confirmed whether it is working?
> >
> > I am testing the latest cvs code, and for test purpose, I am using the
> > sample etc/uri.ini included in the source code. EP1, EP2 and gnugk
> > server all live on the LAN without any firewalls. EP1 is registered
> > with gnugk and EP2 isn't registered with anything. EP2 tries to dial
> > EP1 using uri dialing, but it fails. gnugk log says "Call rejected".
> >
> > See attached log file. Any thoughts why the sample file uri.ini doesn't work?
> >
> > Frank

-- 
Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux