Hi,
we are using kill - HUP for reload:-)
For Michal:
I tested reload on gatekeeper without any load just with one registered
gateway. There was no call before, during and after reload. Billing
backend is on same PC. Reload is taking on this machine same time as in
production environment - almost one minute.
The problem is really with routing tables. We have more than 25
gatekeepers configured as neighbor. On each gatekeeper is registered up
to 300 gateways and terminals, each one with separate number. This
mean a lot of entries in [RoutingPolicy] and [Neighbor::xxxx] sections.
Config files are generated from SQL, and they are distributed to all
gatekeepers by script at same time.
I need to add more entries to config. And I am looking some solution.
Is routing by virtual queue only solution?
Thanks
Jiri
Jerry napsal(a):
Hi,
instead of send reload command from status port
if I use gk.initd.redhat to reload, in check I see it
kill -HUP `cat $GKPID`
RETVAL=$?
Will the gatekeep also lock all calls?
Thanks
If
your reload time is so long, it's possible that some of your gateways
or your billing backend have long response times. To reload the config,
the gatekeeper has to lock all calls. This means no outgoing call setup
is in progress and all auth/acct modules finished their work. Otherwise
the gatekeeper waits till all tasks have finished.
I am not sure, if using SQL config will improve performance (it will
definitelly
improve config management).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jirí Gubík"
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 8:30 PM
> Hi,
> I noticed increased duration of reload time with increased number
of
> routing informations in config file. Our current config files are
around
> 200KB. We use only internal and neighbor routing policy. Current
reload
> time is more than 1 minute, which is too long. We need to reload
our
> gatekeepers several times per day. I currently added to config 500
more
> destinations and reload time was almost 5min or some of
gatekeepers
> crashed.
> Will transfer of config file to SQL help? Or should we focus to
move all
> routing to virtual queue? Is any example application of handling
virtual
> queue available?
> Thanks for answers.
> Jiri
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/