Clarification on SBC emails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,
 
I'm reviewing the emails I sent to the list yesterday and realize they could appear contradictory and therefore somewhat confusing. 
 
To clarify, I am trying to work out two different SBC-related design scenarios that I'll need to implement in my videoconferencing network.  One design is a "WAN-side GK" scenario where multiple customer terminals behind a single SBC (RAS, signalling and RTP proxy) will register against a single GnuGK server. The other scenario is a "LAN-side GK" scenario where I will have a neighbor GK on each side of an SBC that will proxy the LRQ/LRJ/LCF messages.  In that scenario, a Cisco MCM GK will be on the LAN side of the SBC and a GnugGK server will be on the SBC's WAN-side.
 
I'm having trouble with both.  I am, however, impressed with GnuGK and its performance in most of the testing I've done so far.  Thanks to the developers!
 
--
Mike Ockenga
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux