Dimitris Daskopoulos wrote: > Jan Willamowius wrote: > > I like the feature, but maybe we should call the switch > > AcceptUnregisteredLRQ or something similar. Don't all LRQs come from a > > third party ? > > > Actually, "ThirdParty" sounds ok, as 1st and 2nd party implies "us", > neighborhood gatekeepers. > > May I suggest "AcceptNonNeighbourLRQ" to make it even more explicit for > those that have not followed this discussion. AcceptNonNeighborLRQ sounds ok, too. We should just try not to be too implicit. > PS. Jan, could you shed some light on why > [RoutingPolicy] > default=enum,explicit > will not work with ENUM records that return IP addresses? Currently, everything we get back gets set as the new called alias. If it starts with "h323:" thats cut off. Is there some sort of spec what kind of info can be in an Enum response ? And if we only get back an IP, what happens to the original called alias ? Is the IP only added as destination, does the old alias get deleted ? Regards, Jan -- Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
