Jan Willamowius wrote: > I like the feature, but maybe we should call the switch > AcceptUnregisteredLRQ or something similar. Don't all LRQs come from a > third party ? > Actually, "ThirdParty" sounds ok, as 1st and 2nd party implies "us", neighborhood gatekeepers. May I suggest "AcceptNonNeighbourLRQ" to make it even more explicit for those that have not followed this discussion. Thanks Simon. Dimitris PS. Jan, could you shed some light on why [RoutingPolicy] default=enum,explicit will not work with ENUM records that return IP addresses? > > Simon Horne wrote: >> The feature to accept LRQ's from non neighbors is included in the CVS. >> >> To activate >> [RasSrv::LRQFeatures] >> AcceptThirdPartyLRQ=1 {default is 0} >> >> Warning it is experimental. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/