Re: Call Failover

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
OpenH323 works in a lot of cases where other stacks don't...But we could add a switch like 'DangerousRetries=1' so more people cancheck if their works with that.
Regards,Jan
xx xx wrote:> Hi,> I have Wellgate and Micronet network. I have traced that I receive always m_h245socket != NULL or IsH245ResponseReceived =  1 and no call from these devices actually can use the fail-over. > When I call using OpenH323 MyPhone It works. > I have commented m_h245socket != NULL check and it works fine but again most of the situations didn't work again, because many carriers returns fast-start response and still can't complete the call.  > Then I commented all of this and found that it works fine. I saw in the console how the routes are changed and call get completed by third carrier.> > I can send you a log if you want. Just tell me what test you want.> > About the creash I don't know where is the problem because no log could be found and there is no big load ~2-3 cals. I have a day when it crashes 4 times during 1 hour.> If you can give a configuration wich is table, I will appreciate that.> > mortex> > >  >-------- Оригинално писмо -------->  >От:  Jan Willamowius <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>  >Относно: Re:  Call Failover>  >До: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  >Изпратено на: Сряда, 2006, Август 2 11:27:55 EEST>  >---------------------------------->  >>  >xx xx wrote:>  >> >  >> Hi Alex,>  >> I had the same situation. Actually the problem for me was that I have always received m_h245socket != NULL using some CPEs. With others I have no problems. To solve this I commented this checks and now gk works well - just checks the disconnect reason and thus I can easyily control when to fail over the call.>  >>>  >> Actually many carriers gives fast start response and still can't complete the call, so I think thes checks are quite restrictive and not should be done.>  >> >  >>  >I think your solution is too broad for general GnuGk code. Are you>  >sure your callers can establish the 2nd call after they have received>  >H.245 responses from the first failing call ? Or could this result in>  >multiple more retries that all just fail ?>  >>  >> My problem is that my gk crashes very often 1-2 times a day (with this checks and without them, no difference). Can you please share your experience including pwlib, openh323 version. >  >>  >I have some more reports of high load installations crashing with 2.2.4>  >while others run fine. The current guess is that there is a race>  >condition someplace where we handle multiple messages for the same call.>  >But so far no specific cause has been found.>  >>  >Regards,>  >Jan
-- Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cashhttp://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-usersHomepage: http://www.gnugk.org/


[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux