Happy to inform that it is succeeded to make Vega
not to send partyNumber in ARQ and Setup.
It perfectly solved my problem
(thanks to Michal's insistency and patience ;).
Changes made to Vega Stream are:
[h323.if.1]
CU setup_mapping_index=2
[_advanced.setup_mapping.2]
C- name=transparent
[_advanced.setup_mapping.2.bearer_capability]
C- transfer_capability=supplied
C- transfer_mode=supplied
C- transfer_rate=supplied
[_advanced.setup_mapping.2.called_party_number]
CU plan=unknown
CU type=unknown
[_advanced.setup_mapping.2.calling_party_number]
CU plan=unknown
CU presentation=restricted
CU screening=failed
CU type=unknown
but for sake of curiosity I still have a question
to Michal:
Is it fundamentally impossible to route call such as in my case
(Vega -> GK1 -> GK2 -> AddPac2) with partyNumber in Setup?
Note that call "Vega -> GK1 -> AddPac1" works just fine with
partyNumber, the only difference that second call does not
assume any LRQs to be sent.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:39:25 +0500, Zygmuntowicz Michal
<m.zygmuntowicz@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The problem is exactly opposite;) your gateway
sends E164 partyNumber in Setup instead of dialedDigits.
Try to reconfigure your gateway to use dialedDigits alias
type instead of E164.
--
Best regards, Alexey Akimov.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
