RE: EXPERIENCE ON USING GGNUGK TO LINK CISCO GATEWAYS

["Frank Fischer" <frank.fischer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi

 

the Cisco guy is absolutely right - working with cisco gateways strongly degrates voice quality *g*

In fact, it depends on what setup you choose and how much traffic you have to handle. So, yes, when you have a misconcepted setup, voice quality might degrade, but that's not a problem of the gatekeeper then.

For your needs i would use a gatekeeper in routed signaling mode and a storage backend for accouting. A setup like this should be able to handle a large volume of calls.

 

- Frank

 

---

From: openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of maruna
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 11:29 AM
To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: EXPERIENCE ON USING GGNUGK TO LINK CISCO GATEWAYS

Can someone share his experience with me?

 

I have 3 Cisco (5300) gateways talking to each other now. However, I raised the idea of using gatekeeper to link them so that we can have a perfect billing of the gateways but I was told that this arrangement will degrade the voice quality by a guy who claims to be Cisco expert.

 

I need people to comment on this. All of them will be on public ip (routable).

 

Thank you