Bahram S. Biria wrote: > Is there anybody who knows why the smart developers who have done such > a tremendous job in implementing the GNUGK, didn't implement Virtual > Queue routing on receiving other types of signals than ARQ? There > should be a reason ! The reason is very simple: The VirtualQueue feature was implemented long before we had routing policies. Replacing the destination in an ARQ and relying on the endpoints to do the rest was the simplest way to have external applications do the routing. Of course you are right that it would be nice to have the VirtualQueues work on all kinds of calls. Today it probably would be a bit simpler than back then because we have a lot more infrastructure in place, but it still is quite a bit of work and nobody has come forward to provice or sponsor such an implementation. Regards, Jan -- Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track? If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy. Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
