Re: Too many Sockets!!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Well, that looks like something very obscure.
Since GnuGK definitely not returning that reason, you have to see what is the 
source device that originates that error. 
This error is given by the terminating ISDN equipment if it can not reach the 
prefix/number (in example, because the area code has been changed) and a tone 
has to be played to the caller (like "fast busy"), so I doubt that it is a 
GnuGK fault. 



On Monday 14 March 2005 17:40, hamed akhavan wrote:
> I have changed the paramters now and seems i dont get the proxychannel
> error again but something else has happened which i am puzzled about!
>
> When the calls are crossing this GK, i never see the total of concurrent
> calls to go over 25-30 anymore! But as soon as we directly send the calls
> to the GW receiving calls we go way above 2/3 T1s.
>
> Looked like something is wrong with the gnugk settings so I checked the
> statistics on the Main GK, and seems that lots of calls are getting
> disconnected with cause code 4 (Send special information tone.) which is
> relativly unusal cause code!
>
> If there is a problem, it happens when there is a larger traffic, so giving
> you the raw debug is quiet difficult!
>
> Any ideas why this would be happening? All i can think of is maybe this is
> due to GK being on windows that acts abnormal!
>
> And we are not proxying anything, in fact we are just using this GK only
> because our exising Main GK does not allow false ANI to be added, and we
> need to send false ANI to a particular network provider. So all the calls
> going to that provider must cross gnugk which puts a false ANI and routes
> the calls to that single GW.
>
> Regards
> Hamed Nik
>
> >From: "Zygmuntowicz Michal" <m.zygmuntowicz@xxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To: <openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re:  Too many Sockets!!
> >Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 01:02:40 +0100
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from lists-outbound.sourceforge.net ([66.35.250.225]) by
> >mc10-f6.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sun, 13 Mar 2005
> >16:02:53 -0800
> >Received: from projects.sourceforge.net (sc8-sf-list2-b.sourceforge.net
> >[10.3.1.8])by sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net (Postfix) with ESMTPid
> >EA232131F1; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:02:25 -0800 (PST)
> >Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11]
> >helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net)by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp
> >(Exim 4.30)id 1DAd1h-0002hm-EQfor openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:01:41 -0800
> >Received: from smtp4k.poczta.onet.pl ([213.180.130.38])by
> >sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41)id 1DAd1f-0006ET-Obfor
> >openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:01:41 -0800
> >Received: from spidercom.pl ([213.17.199.138]:36102 "EHLO quarcom")by
> >kps4.test.onet.pl with ESMTP id <S4341167AbVCNAB1>;Mon, 14 Mar 2005
> >01:01:27 +0100
> >X-Message-Info: o8IIVuzO8A33ou/u+g2JLBcBA2TaIh2i04z7NK67W8Q=
> >References: <BAY101-F27B0EE61B1662363A3BDEDDD550@xxxxxxx>
> >Organization: Quarcom
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
> >X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
> >X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net.See
> >http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.Report problems to
> >http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=2000010.0
> >SF_CHICKENPOX_PERIOD   BODY: Text interparsed with .0.0
> > SF_CHICKENPOX_SLASH BODY: Text interparsed with /0.0 SF_CHICKENPOX_MINUS 
> >   BODY: Text interparsed with -0.0 SF_CHICKENPOX_UNDERSCORE BODY: Text
> > interparsed with _0.0 SF_CHICKENPOX_EQUAL    BODY: Text interparsed with
> > =0.0
> >SF_CHICKENPOX_AT       BODY: Text interparsed with @0.0
> >SF_CHICKENPOX_APOSTROPHE BODY: Text interparsed with '0.0 AWL
> >      AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
> >Errors-To: openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >X-BeenThere: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
> >Precedence: bulk
> >List-Unsubscribe:
> ><https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users>,<mailto:op
> >enh323gk-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe> List-Id:
> > <openh323gk-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
> >List-Post: <mailto:openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >List-Help:
> ><mailto:openh323gk-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
> >List-Subscribe:
> ><https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users>,<mailto:op
> >enh323gk-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
> > List-Archive:
> ><http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=openh323gk-users>
> >Return-Path: openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2005 00:02:53.0448 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[2B429080:01C52829]
> >
> >If you don't need RTP proxy, you can leave RtpHandlerNumber=1.
> >For Windows, the only available way to scale up is to increase number
> >of signaling/rtp threads. Besides, this will give you a better message
> >throughput.
> >Also, Windows platfom handles fd_sets differently than Unix and using
> >such large fd_sets may cause more performance slowdown than spreading
> >sockets among threads.
> >
> >----- Original Message ----- From: "hamed akhavan" <hakhavan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 12:05 AM
> >
> >>Thanks for the reply. Any idea what the values of those parameters should
> >>be for 200 concurrent calls?
> >>
> >>I see that in the presentation it mentions
> >>"CallSignalHandlerNumber=ConcurrentCalls/10" so for example if i have 200
> >>concurrent cals the value of CallSignalHandlerNumber should be 20, how
> >>about the RtpHandlerNumber? is there a formula for that too?
> >>
> >>Also is there a pre-compiled binary with FD_SETSIZE set to 1024?
> >>
> >>Regards
> >>Hamed Nik
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> >Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> >Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> >
> >_______________________________________________________
> >
> >List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
> >Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>
> _______________________________________________________
>
> List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
> Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click

_______________________________________________________

List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux