Re: child gk prefix and RRQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I'm not sure I understand your question.  If AcceptUnregisteredCalls
is 0 on the parent GK, then the child must register before it can
make or receive calls (unless it is listed as a permanent endpoint).
But that is already in your configuration, so I don't know why you
can call without RRQ.  You should be seeing a "caller not registered"
error.

There are many authentication and authorization methods that you can
use to restrict calling.

--Stewart

----- Original Message -----
From: "Raschel" <raschel@xxxxxx>
To: <openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 8:14 AM
Subject:  child gk prefix and RRQ


Hi,

i ´ve just setup a child gk and can easy circumvent the authorisation
mechanism of the parent gk by setting up a number as i like e.g. 0815
(endpoint) and set a prefix to this number.
So it´s easy to register this number without authorisation and place or
receive a call.
For unattendend proxy server this is not a glorious.
To prevent the child gk setting up a prefix i guess there is a option at the
gatekeeper.ini but i found nothing to force the child gk sending the RRQ to
the parent gk (except i make a setup at the child gk, which is easy to
circumvent)

any idea? please help.

big thx
TOM



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl

_______________________________________________________

List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux