Hmm. It would be strange unless the billing does not send back h323-return-code or sends it with Cisco Vendor Id.
The bug affected both ARQ and Setup handlers. Anyway, it's fixed now and we can forget about it:-)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Aivis Olsteins" <aivis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 8:32 AM
Hi Michal,
just to add that this happens only to ARQ generated Access-Reqests. For SetupUnreg it works fine. (with the same billing system)
regards, Aivis
Zygmuntowicz Michal wrote:You hit a bug (your billing does not use Cisco vendor Id for VSA
attributes) that caused your billing-specific attributes to be interpreted
like Cisco's ones (the code ignored vendor id). I just commited
a proper fix to the cvs.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
